Comment Policy

All comments to posts have to await approval. Approval does not happen immediately. NOTE: Comments reflect the opinions of the person writing them and should not be assumed to reflect the opinion of the blog.

Management has two priorities: 1) Making sure money is made, hence upgrading and filling up apartments is their goal. "Amenities" are important in selling the place, though few residents use them. 2) If someone needs medical attention, Public Safety will be there, if alerted.

Quality of life issues are not that important, however. They tend to be ignored, despite "the rules." So you will see a lot that isn't taken care of properly, and complaints will be met with a creative excuse and a smile.

"Peace and quiet" must be a cruel joke, though this property is sold that way. There can be no peace and quiet as ALL apartments must be upgraded, which includes the installation of an AC unit below the window. Aside from the continual construction about the neighborhood, there is a new and noisy subway extension being built along East 14 st and the shut down of the L line. "Choosing" to live in NYC, now the newest mantra, is a fabrication when the talk is of ST and PCV, which was traditionally quiet, with no construction noise.

Though money was always important, it is now more important than ever. Money rules many things, as you will find.

At this point, 30 years into living here and seeing many things, I can state that Management and their reps are BS-ing us. I can't say that loudly enough: We are being BS-ed. I don't see any genuine change. Sorry.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Tishman Speyer to Hit ST/PCV with Huge MCI for Plantings



No, I haven't heard anything official, but it is a certainty that Tishman Speyer will ask for a huge MCI for the plantings the company has been doing (and in many cases redoing) all year. This massive project involved at least 200,000 plants, 10,000 trees and more than 3,000 shrubs, and it is still continuing, with newer plants, trees and shrubs either replacing earlier plantings (some of which have died) or filling in areas that lack such greenery. According to MCI law, TS cannot ask for such a MCI unless it is combined with considerable repaving work--and, of course, we know that's been happening all summer, and now fall, long. While a MCI cannot raise rents of rent-stabilized tenants more by 6% per year, it can, if large enough, be spread over several years. So RS Stuy Town/Peter Cooper residents can look forward to an 18% increase in their rent, if this MCI is allowed to happen. Market-rate tenants are not safe from an increase, either, as surely Tishman Speyer will raise the rent on market-raters, justifying such an increase by the "renovations" it has done to the complex. Tishman Speyer will also use tales of property owner woe in these troubling economic times to try to rationalize even further that the huge MCI increase needs to happen to save their investment (actually, the investment of other people's money, but that's another issue).

The Tenants Association and tenants need to coalesce and fight this MCI request when it happens. These plantings were not necessary. In many cases, they were wrongly done and money was wasted (and still is) trying to correct mistakes. In other cases, older groundskeeping was purposefully let go to waste, so that an "improvement" would be mandated. (Case in point: the Oval area, which was beautiful when Met Life left, but deteriorated badly under TS management.) In many areas, pavings of roads and pathways also were not necessary, or if they were, they followed fairly recent previous pavings that were sloppily or inadequately done. Tenants should not have to pay for the bad work done by firms hired by the landlord.

The joke is that not long ago previous landlord Met Life decided to cut down trees in order to "open up the oval for a more expansive view." You can read about this project here. So continues the bizarre planning at Stuy Town/Peter Cooper. One project accomplishes one thing, the next project overrides that project, then a new project destroys that project, and on and on it goes. The only thing that is a constant is that the tenants suffer.

7 comments:

factchecker said...

By law only items that have reached the end of their useful life can be MCIed. Therefore, all paving that is requested to be MCIed had to be a certain age. The list of ages that items must be is published by the DHCR. Furthermore it must be completely replaced. Therefore for a paving MCI to go through, all of the paving must have been replaced in the entire block and lot, and been a certain age. In addition, it can only be be charged one time, ie if they mess up and do it over they can only charge for one paving, not multiple pavings.

Stuy Town Reporter said...

Thanks, factchecker. We await what Tishman Speyer will try to do here.

AnnieMae said...

So long as the Scumberg Administration is in power, Tishman Speyer will get their way on everything. We have to get rid of Scumberg and all the little Scumbies in City Hall who collaberated with his power grab.

ziggy said...

Absolutely no repaving has been done in PCV

STNative said...

All of PCV was repaved BEFORE Stuyvesant Town. You might have missed it.

Everything that I've studied at DHCR says that they can't MCI the plants, and with all the other stuff, they don't need to. They've got enough MCI projects going to push plenty of leases into luxury decontrol territory. Let's MAKE Albany take note of this and ACT on tenant protections, including these ridiculous perpetual MCI charges !

janematty said...

This website is using scare tactics similar to Sarah Palin in the Presidential campaign.

Stuy Town Reporter said...

No tactics here.