The truth about a complex built for veterans and the middle class and how it has evolved through the years to become one of the more interesting and controversial of New York stories.
All comments to posts have to await approval. Please be aware that, depending on when I'm logged onto the internet, it may take me hours, even longer, to moderate comments, so if they don't turn up in a speedy fashion, they are still in the queue. Comments that cross a line I'm not comfortable with will not get approved.
NOTE: Comments reflect the opinions of the person writing them and should not be assumed to reflect the opinion of the blog. Because of the anonymous nature of the commentary, specific agendas can be pushed by a sole individual and may not reflect a more popular belief by the residents of this community.
The question isn't answered in this Street Easy listing for 3 Stuyvesant Oval #MD. Note the recessed AC unit, which I believe that apartment does not have. Nor would an M apartment have such a view. The broker is Citi Habitats, which is the "exclusive" broker for Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village. Really, the chutzpah of implying that our community feels like a suburban one and not an extension of a college campus! Why is it that everyone who deals with ST/PCV on a business level has no shame or is a comedian?
The plaque. Situated on the West Side of the Oval path. Honoring Met Life Chairman Frederick H. Ecker. Removed in 2002 by Met Life in advance of an eventual sale of ST/PCV. The words on the plaque were the reason for the removal (not ST/PCV's early racist rental policy). Left there, the words would have made a mockery of what was to come.
These are the words, the vision, that no future landlord of ST/PCV could leave standing:
"... who with the vision of experience and the
energy of youth conceived and brought into being this project, and
others like it, that families of moderate means might live in health,
comfort and dignity in park-like communities and that a pattern might be
set of private enterprise productively devoted to public service."
The removed plaque has never been seen again. No one knows where it is.
I'm going to try again on a subject that's been raised here before....
Partitions have been put in by the landlord for years now. What are these partitions? Are they partitions that convert, say, a two-bedroom apartment into a three bedroom apartment, as we see in the diagram below? (Click on any image to make larger.)
This is the type of DoB application that is filled out by the builder to create partitions, presented here, for our purpose, in its more important three sections:
Please note that the alteration type checked off is Type 2 and not Type 1. A Type 1 alternation contains a check mark area for "Change in Room Count/Dwelling Units" and one for "Change in Occupancy/Use".
So if the partitions created in this application for three Stuy Town apartments are partitions to create an extra bedroom, as in the diagram above (which is not of any of these apartments, btw, but just an example), how is it possible that these partitions were legally put in, as the paperwork was not properly filled out?
These partition applications are very numerous in Stuy Town and Peter Cooper Village and can be accessed at the DoB site:
From there, go down to the left and see "Buildings Information"... and fill in.
It's obvious that the creation of extra bedrooms serves the landlord very well, particularly in renting out apartments to hordes of students. This complex may now have 5,000 more tenants thanks to the creation of extra bedrooms.
So, TA, have you looked into this at all? And, if so, what is the outcome of your research?
The info below I found on a site that is not official, but it tries to
explain "Alteration Type". The insertion of partitions to create a new
bedroom (if that's what those partitions are for) is considered by CW and before them, TS, as Type-2. Here's the
An Alteration Type-I Application is required when there is a
major change to the Certificate of Occupancy of a building, such as
converting it from commercial to residential, an interior conversion of
the building or a space within a building, or due to a building
addition. Most commonly, an Alteration Type-I Application will be used
to change the Maximum Number of Persons for a space, to change the
Occupancy or Use Group of a space, and/or to change the Description of a
Alteration Type-II Application is an alteration that
doesn’t change the use or occupancy of the building but requires several
types of work, such as plumbing and construction. An Alteration Type-II
Application may be used when there is no change to the Certificate of
Occupancy due to the proposed alterations, such as with an interior
fitout or alteration. When an Alteration Type-II is filed under
Directive-14 (such is the case 99% of the time), the Applicant or other
NYS Registered Professional Engineer or Registered Architect may signoff
the application with a Directive-14 Final Inspection.
Type-III is a minor alteration that involves only one type of work,
such as a curb cut or a construction fence. ALT-1s and ALT 2s must be
filed by a registered architect or licensed engineer; some ALT3s don’t
require detailed plans and can be filed by a non-professional.
Well, that's not his name yet, but can one hope? So, the complex is filthy, dog and human crap here and there, including in elevators; there's noise to wake the dead at all hours of the night (partying, Con Ed work, etc), many of the laundry rooms are not working at full capacity; not all buildings in Peter Cooper Village have fully recovered from Hurricane Sandy; the construction of the new management office is not yet finished and has created a nightmare for those living nearby; the complex is becoming more and more of a dorm; residents are in the dark about the future of this place....
So what is CWCapital/CompassRock's latest effort?
A toy squirrel mascot for the complex that residents are urged to name!!!
If you thought that rezoning of the East Side to allow for massive towers and huge windfalls for Big Real Estate was not going to happen, you were wrong. Mayor de Blasio (!) and Dan Garodnick, the councilman in whose district this will be happening, have agreed to a "reincarnated" zoning plan that is currently limited in scope, but which will pave the way for a thorough transformation of the East Side that will please Big Real Estate very much while giving us peons perks such as new subway entrances, stairways, entrances/exits, etc., all to get workers moving efficiently (it is hoped) from outside of the castle where they live (the outer boroughs) to inside of the castle to work for the nobility who will be the only ones left to afford living in Manhattan.
First up is One Vanderbuilt, which, when built right next to the stately Grand Central, will be the second tallest building in the city. You may as well squash Grand Central and be done with it.
Pardon the cynicism, but it seems Dan's previous contrariness toward our former mayor, Mike Bloomberg, on this zoning issue may just have been a case of "let's wait out the rezoning until I get more clout" or "let's wait out the zoning until after election time."
With the massive development of this area (which, despite the perks, will create even more nightmarish congestion in Midtown), here's another neighborhood that true New Yorkers will be staying away from. Soon, only Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village will be left to remind people of the real New York. And, yes, that is a joke.