http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/nyregion/deal-on-rent-laws-and-property-tax-cap-in-albany.html
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and legislative leaders struck a tentative deal on Tuesday paving the way for a vote on issues that affect millions of New Yorkers — renewing regulation of rent-regulated apartments, capping property taxes for homeowners and raising tuition at state universities — but reached no agreement on whether to take a vote on legalizing same-sex marriage....
The rent deal appeared to fall well short of what many Democrats and tenant activists had hoped for, though Democratic lawmakers will probably vote for it. And the modest strengthening of rent regulations came at a high price for Democrats from New York City — a commitment to pass a property tax cap, which many Democratic lawmakers fear will exacerbate disparities in education spending between wealthy and poor school districts.
The renewal of rent regulations would leave in place laws that allow landlords to deregulate apartments when tenants’ rent and income reach certain thresholds, but would raise those thresholds, to $2,500 from $2,000 in monthly rent, and to $200,000 from $175,000 in annual household income. Tenant advocates had sought for more than a decade to abolish the deregulation laws, and they hoped finally to achieve that goal under Mr. Cuomo, a popular Democrat.
The proposed rent deal also requires that landlords document more of the money they spend to improve rent-stabilized apartments before they can pass along those costs to renters.
But with Senate Republicans, whose districts have relatively few regulated apartments, unwilling to make further concessions, Assembly leaders appeared ready to settle for what they could get.
More at the above link.
As far as action on the Roberts decision, this gives a rundown (also linked on Lux's Facebook page):
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20110622/REAL_ESTATE/110629947
The state legislature reached a tentative agreement to extend New York City's rent laws, but a cloud of uncertainty still looms over thousands of regulated units affected by a 2-year-old court decision that many hoped would be addressed during the session.
Sources said there were some discussions on how to deal with the fall out from a 2009 Appellate Division of New York's Supreme Court ruling that owners of Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village had illegally deregulated units when receiving a tax break known as a J-51. That decision, which affected thousands of apartments beyond those in that sprawling complex, left the door open to reregulating units and reimbursing tenants for overcharges. But since then, neither the courts nor state housing authorities have reached any type of agreement about how to implement the ruling. A Republican senator introduced a bill that would have allowed landlords to pay the taxes while not repaying tenants for overcharges but it failed to gain traction.
“It was a disappointment that they didn't address the Roberts decision,” said Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, which represents landlords, referring to the common name of court ruling which stems from the last name of one of the tenants, Amy Roberts, who brought the suit. “”We really think there needs to be a decision by the Legislature since the courts don't know what to do.”
He added that the Legislature also failed to extend the J-51 program, which extends tax breaks for making building repairs and expires this December. Mr. Spinola hopes legislators will return later this year for a special session, during which the program can be extended. He added that legislators could also address the Roberts decision at that time.
Meanwhile, legislators agreed to grant some small increases in tenant protection as they extended the current rent laws. Presently, landlords can deregulate a unit when the apartment is vacant and rent goes over $2,000 a month or when a family's income goes above $175,000 and the rent is at least $2,000 a month. Under the deal, the rent limit increases to $2,500 a month in both instances and the family can earn up to $200,000 a year.
“The agreement is much better than it could have been,” said Maggie Russell-Ciardi, executive Director of Tenants & Neighbors, a tenant advocacy organization. “Of course, it wasn't everything tenants wanted."
In other developments, the Legislature also agreed to extend the 421-A program which gives developers temporary property tax exemptions to build affordable housing.
“We are obviously pleased with that,” Mr. Spinola said. “It is critical to get building going again.”
17 comments:
Some deal! The Dems and the Gov did a deal with the Devil. It does f**k all for tenants.
Unlike the LL Facebook, you can't even get on the TA Facebook unless you sign up for Facebook. I think the TA is some private, exclusive club at this point.
Dunno, I looked at the LL Facebook page a couple of times today and he seems to be obsessing about furniture and garbage removal. I don't blame people for putting their cast-off furniture in the carriage rooms. We used to be able to have furniture taken away for free even if we left it in the hall. Diminution of services in my opinion. I would never pay to have furniture carted away. We pay more and more in rent and get less and less in services and it ain't gonna get any better given the "Deal" that's just been struck in Albany.
Both links in "The Deal?" post were linked by Lux first on his Facebook.
I greatly admire Lux Living and STR. Just wish we had a forum to sound off and exchange ideas. The TA has really let us down in that respect.
Can't help wondering what people think Lux Living owes them and why.
Didn't Lux make an offer to the TA to set up and host a blog for them? I seem to remember something like that, and that the TA didn't take him up on the offer.
I don't think Lux Living owes anybody anything. I'm just sad his forum has gone. I'm very grateful for all he has done for us. Just because you miss somebody doesn't mean you feel they owe you. As for the TA, I really don't think they have the technical know-how to have a forum and probably don't have anyone willing to moderate it. I think they do their bit when it comes to organizing rallies and fighting MCIs (at least I think they fight MCIs, that's what someone told me). They do what they can and Lux Living and STR do what they can. Still miss reading the LL comments because some of those subscribers were very knowledgable about what goes on with the politics of housing in our city. They were quite entertaining at times, too! I also miss Lux Livings humorous "Manny" posts and his brilliant photoshop graphics, etc. You have to be a real pro to be able to do all that. I miss him, but I don't resent his leaving or feel he owes us anything.
Gotta agree with 10:21am. I miss those good things too -- Manny, comments, info.
STR you're right. I remember LL's offer.
The TA is sending out emails saying that the rent regulations have been strengthened. Are they fucking stupid? The regulations have been weakened. In 2015 when the current anaemic regulations expire there will be a lot fewer apartments still cover by rs and rc. 2015 will probably be the date of the demise of the rent regulations and that is EXACTLY what the RE industry wants and what Cuomo (the jackass) gave to them. There's no way of rebutting or questioning what the TA is saying because their site is designed that no one can comment, no one can contact them and their Facebook site is dead. The whole damn organization is dead as far as its usefulness and accuracy is concerned.
The past few days I have been obsessing over dumped furniture but there are dozens of links about the rent regulation situation on the LL Facebook page. I posted everything that was sent to me in addition to what I found on my own.
With regards to the new TA blog, I ordered their domain in March of 2010 and it wasn't until last week they asked me to get together and work on it. Unfortunately I was having a really shitty day and had to cancel. But what's the point now? It's too late.
Poster at 129PM
While I agree that the TA is practically useless, why do you think rent laws were weakened? they may not have been strengthened as much as tenants wanted but income and rent levels were raised, calculation of MCIs was made less landlord -friendly and the Roberts decision was not overturned
Yeah, that seems to be a good summary. Unless something changes, tenants came out ahead, by at least a bit.
This deal leaves Rent Stabilization hanging on the edge of extinction. What happens in 4 years, expecially if we wind up with a GOP majority at that time ?. LuxLiving posted this link to an article that I found very informative, essentially saying that in 2011 dollars, the decontrol numbers are worse than when Pataki implemented them, not to mention that Silver gave away the $250,000 high income decontrol figure in the last negotiation.
Gov. Cuomo’s faux victory on behalf of NYC renters
Exactly. We got a shitty deal. Cuomo is a liar and a manipulative bastard. He gave us fuck-all and left us in a worst situation than Pataki put us in. Silver and the rest of the clowns did NOTHING to help us.
Wasn't Cuomo, when he was head of HUD under Clinton, the man who forced banks to make sub-prime loans, thus starting the housing/economic meltdown that we are in today? You'd never know it from the media who are touting him as Presidential material in 2016.
I'd vote for Michele Bachman, Sarah Palin and Newt Gigrich (all of whom I despise!) before I'd vote for this pandering, daddy-boy liar and despicable fraud. Spitzer, O Spitzer, why didn't you keep your whoring private! Look what you stuck us with because you couldn't keep your little dick under control!
Post a Comment